2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 394 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Cavalier | 323 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2286 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |
