2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 314 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (98 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Cavalier | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 98 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |