2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 73 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 203 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cavalier | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |
