2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (110 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (126 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cavalier | 323 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |