2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1992 Mazda 323

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 323 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier. (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 44 kg more than 1992 Mazda 323.

Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 323 (235 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier. (203 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Cavalier 1992 Mazda 323
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Cavalier 323
Year Released 2004 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2286 cc 1840 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 235 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.2:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1274 kg 1230 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4090 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 53 L 60 L