2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (138 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 216 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass (230 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier. (203 Nm). This means 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cavalier | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2740 mm |