2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2003 Mazda 2

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 224 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Cavalier 2003 Mazda 2
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Cavalier 2
Year Released 2004 2003
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2286 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 140 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 128 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1274 kg 1050 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 53 L 50 L