2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 8 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Cavalier | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.4 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 50 L |
