2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 746 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (305 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Colorado | FX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2620 mm |
