2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 506 kg more than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Colorado | Mayflower |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 79 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 45 L |