2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 1138 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Colorado | R 360 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 22 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 63 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |