2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk (209 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 68 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk (396 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
Model | Colorado | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 396 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |