2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1965 Holden EH
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 271 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Holden EH. (238 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1965 Holden EH | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Colorado | EH |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 238 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |