2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 16 kg more than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Colorado | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |
