2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 694 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Colorado | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 133 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1634 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 57 L |