2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 271 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (305 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Colorado | Challenger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 5210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 352 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 75 L |