2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1978 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1978 Ford Mustang. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1978 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 491 kg more than 1978 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (305 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Ford Mustang. (192 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1978 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Mustang |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 192 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2560 mm |