2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 589 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Colorado | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1634 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2520 mm |