2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1979 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 256 kg more than 1979 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1979 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Colorado | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 170 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2590 mm |