2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 553 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Colorado | Ascona |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |