2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (103 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 280 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Colorado | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 89 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |