2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Colorado | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
