2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1986 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. (162 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 140 kg more than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. (241 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1986 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 241 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1378 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 54 L |