2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 3 kg more than 1996 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1996 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 217 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3030 mm |