2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Colorado | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
