2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1998 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 59 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (252 Nm). This means 1998 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1998 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 357 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 99.3 mm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 59 L |