2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1999 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 13 kg more than 1999 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (366 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 1999 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 62 L |