2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Sable. (153 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 206 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (305 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Colorado | Sable |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 85 L |