2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Puma would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 483 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2002 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Puma |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 45 L |