2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 468 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Colorado | 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 128 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 76.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |