2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2003 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 726 kg more than 2003 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2003 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Colorado | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1810 mm |
