2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2003 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 52 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2003 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Colorado | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |