2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT
To start off, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (389 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT weights approximately 139 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (520 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (305 Nm). This means 2005 Ford FPV BF GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2005 Ford FPV BF GT | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Colorado | FPV BF GT |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 389 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 520 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 105.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |
