2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 206 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (252 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Colorado | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2834 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 294 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 95 L |