2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2008 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2008 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 902 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lincoln Mark LT (495 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (252 Nm). This means 2008 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2008 Lincoln Mark LT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Colorado | Mark LT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 2358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 114 L |