2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 81 kg more than 2010 Ford C-Max. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | C-Max |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 230 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2648 mm |