2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Flex weights approximately 510 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Flex (336 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 Ford Flex | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Flex |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 336 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |