2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 750 kg more than 2010 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (305 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Ka |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 106 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |