2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (252 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Colorado | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 74 L |
