2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 323 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander.

Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (527 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (305 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Colorado 2010 Jeep Commander
Make Chevrolet Jeep
Model Colorado Commander
Year Released 2004 2010
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3458 cc 5654 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 220 HP 358 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 527 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 6 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1716 kg 1393 kg
Vehicle Length 5270 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1660 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.8 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 18.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 74 L 80 L