2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 856 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Colorado | Nano |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 48 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 73.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 37 L |