2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 156 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Colorado | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 173 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |