2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2012 Ford E-350
To start off, 2012 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1374 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-350 (474 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (252 Nm). This means 2012 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2012 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 474 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 132 L |