2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2012 Honda Fit
To start off, 2012 Honda Fit is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2012 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 584 kg more than 2012 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (305 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2012 Honda Fit | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Colorado | Fit |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 144 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2499 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |