2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2012 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2012 Nissan Rogue is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 54 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2012 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Colorado | Rogue |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 237 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4656 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |