2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 Ford Flex
To start off, 2013 Ford Flex is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Flex (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Flex weights approximately 588 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Flex (346 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 Ford Flex | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Flex |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 346 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2256 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1726 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2994 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |