2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 16 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (252 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Colorado | Evora |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |
