2004 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 5,970 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Corvette (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 722 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Corvette | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Corvette | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 5970 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1577 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |
