2004 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Corvette | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Corvette | Karma |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 405 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 36 L |
