2004 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 58 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Corvette.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Corvette. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Corvette (488 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Corvette | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Corvette | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.6 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 47 L |